Make your ps4 download speed 100x faster

#Make your ps4 download speed 100x faster full#
#Make your ps4 download speed 100x faster windows#

Same with mouse and keyboard input, it's why your mouse tends to move smoothly on most Windows machines even when the rest of the OS is obviously struggling with some heavy task. Modern network connections are working with multiple MB per second, and are (relatively) more tolerant of slight delays. Audio generation only requires ~88.2 KB of data per second, but latency is much lower and less tolerable by a human listener.

It's weird to think of audio as higher priority than networking traffic, but in this case that actually makes a ton of sense. This is definitely a problem, but the fix should not have been to limit the amount of work done per interrupt, but instead to delegate that work to some other process with lower priority. In this case, it sounds like Vista's network interrupt was running for so long that it was taking priority over other interrupts (audio) and causing them to not be serviced quickly enough. Audio hardware generally generates its own interrupts when its buffers have emptied out, to signal the OS to provide it more audio to play. Network cards generate interrupts when data is finished sending or receiving. In this case the scheduler isn't as much of a problem as the interrupt service routine, which by its very nature interrupts the normal thread-level scheduler to do some work with the hardware.Д«oth the Network Interface Card (or wireless chip) and the Audio hardware generate interrupts for a variety of reasons. Obviously this analysis is incredibly shallow and would need a ton of conversation and observation I'm just making the point that different phases of product market fit require very different approaches & it's worth being aware. On the other hand if I were managing the same hypothetical team in a highly defined context, for example a mature product or an open source library with a large userbase, the 'quick hack' people would need to change their ways. Not because of speed per se, but because he may be investing too much time in directions that don't help the company learn about their market, and he may be building grand architectural visions that are hard to delete when we realise the product is going in a direction that person didn't anticipate. If I were managing this hypothetical team in a pre-product-market-fit startup I could see the 'slow' person as a potentially greater risk than the others. I'd also add that it's important to understand the context in which your team is working. You won't look good and nobody will be happy.

#Make your ps4 download speed 100x faster full#

> So it's important to figure out what kind of manager you have, and try not to be the slow guy on a team full of quick-hack people. Sometimes the simpler less-sophisticated solution just works better in practice.

Often a company will have a 'sophisticated best-ever algorithm' and then put in a hacky lazy work-around for some problem, and obviously don't tell anyone about it. Many people had perfectly consistent mp3 playback when copying files over the network 10 times as fast in other OSes (including Win XP!) Mark Russinovich justified it by explaining that the network interrupt routine was just too expensive to be able to guarantee no glitches in media playback, so it was limited to 10 packets per millisecond when any media was playing:Д«ut obviously this is a pretty crappy one-size-fits-all prioritization scheme for something marketed as a most-sophisticated best-ever OS at the time: Reminds me of how Windows Vista's 'Multimedia Class Scheduler Service' would put a low cap on network throughput if any sound was playing: